Released (US): December 17, 1971
Genre: Action/Adventure
Length: 120 Min.
Director: Guy Hamilton
Writer:Richard Maibaum & Tom Mankiewicz
Major Cast Members:
Sean Connery – James Bond
Jill St. John – Tiffany Case
Charles Gray – Ernst Stavro Blofeld
Jimmy Dean – Willard White
Norman Burton – Felix Leiter
Awards:
Golden Screen Award (Germany)
Budget: $7,200,000
Box Office: $116,000,000 (worldwide)
Plot Overview:Sean Connery returns to the James Bond series for one final go around, and is skeptical of his assignment to track down a diamond smuggling ring. After a little digging, however, Bond uncovers a more devious plot to gain world control. With this discovery, Bond comes face to face once again with his arch nemesis, Ernst Stavro Blofeld. With the help of Felix Leiter and the American CIA, Bond must get to the bottom of Blofeld’s latest plot and stop it before the situation gets out of hand.
Did you know?: Originally, American actor John Gavin was supposed to play the role of Bond until Sean Connery jumped back in at the last moment.
Review:Mercifully, George Lazenby stepped down as his role as James Bond after a sub-per performance in On Her Majesty’s Secret Service, allowing Sean Connery to step back into the role for one final go around. Despite the fact that Connery is noticeably older in this one (nine years will do that to you), he returns the Bond character to its former glory.
Like many of its predecessors, the acting is again very good in this film. Connery as Bond was much better than the performance that Lazenby gave in the previous Bond installment, although it is evident that Connery doesn’t have the same zip that he had at the beginning of his career in Dr. No and Thunderball. Unlike other recent Blofeld’s, Charles Gray actually gives the perception of a criminal mastermind. Where Telly Savalas (On Her Majesty’s Secret Service) and Donald Pleasance (You Only Live Twice) fall short, Gray succeeds. He is villainous and nasty, characteristics that seem lacking in other Blofeld’s of the past. It’s a shame that they didn’t find him earlier.
Acting is good throughout, as Jill St. John as Tiffany Chase and Norman Burton as Felix Leiter are both good as well.
As far as the plot goes, it is a little out there, but not as much as You Only Live Twice. Despite this, the plot runs nicely and there is enough action and suspense throughout to keep the viewer hooked. It’s not overdone though, as there are plenty of light hearted moments throughout this film as well. Thankfully, the oppressive presence of fancy gadgets seem to take a back seat throughout the film, with Q only making an appearance to help Bond change his voice slightly to fool Blofeld. Very well done.
Overall, a very solid Bond flick. I would recommend this one to most everybody, but particularly to those who are into the spy genre. Thanks to the return of Connery, this is a well acted, well written movie that should not be missed.
Final Grade: B
Other Reviews:
DVD Town: “…a bit sillier than most Bond adventures but probably not as bad as it could have been.”
Reel Views: “The ending, while high on pyrotechnics, is low on tension, bringing Connery’s era to a rather dissatisfying conclusion. The actor deserved to go out on a higher note, but his tenure as Bond provided enough moments of quality entertainment to eclipse Diamonds Are Forever’s final whimper.”
DVD Verdict: “A good middle of the road entry in the franchise, Diamonds Are Forever strays farther from the serious thriller mold of many of its compatriots but thankfully stops short of self-parody.”
Filmcritic.com: “It’s fun at times but overall one of the most hopelessly dated 007 flicks ever.”
EFilm Critic: “Sean Connery’s performance sums up what is one of the worst Bond films – drab and lifeless.”
TVGuide: “Next door to glass, but aided by the return of Connery (George Lazenby had undertaken the role of Bond in On Her Majesty’s Secret Service) teamed with Jill St. John, instead of the usual parade of faceless Bond girls.”
Watch (allow time to buffer):
Released (US): December 18, 1969
Unlike Connery, Lazenby does not resemble Bond at all. The classy, witty, tough spy that we all have grown to love in Sean Connery disappears in George Lazenby. Now, Lazenby did not do a bad job in the role as Bond, but Connery is so far superior that it is difficult not to notice the drop off. It is easiest to say it this way: Sean Connery isJames Bond, George Lazenby is not.
Other Reviews: